<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Basic Badugi Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerwants.com/strategy-tips/beginner/basic-badugi-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerwants.com/strategy-tips/beginner/basic-badugi-strategy/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 03:27:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kelsi Guidry</title>
		<link>http://pokerwants.com/strategy-tips/beginner/basic-badugi-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelsi Guidry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerwants.com/?p=122#comment-69</guid>
		<description>If an ace is the lowest possible card... how would that be an awful hand? But I do understand now how 4 aces wouldn&#039;t be the best possible hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If an ace is the lowest possible card&#8230; how would that be an awful hand? But I do understand now how 4 aces wouldn&#39;t be the best possible hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelsi Guidry</title>
		<link>http://pokerwants.com/strategy-tips/beginner/basic-badugi-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelsi Guidry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerwants.com/?p=122#comment-63</guid>
		<description>If an ace is the lowest possible card... how would that be an awful hand? But I do understand now how 4 aces wouldn&#039;t be the best possible hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If an ace is the lowest possible card&#8230; how would that be an awful hand? But I do understand now how 4 aces wouldn&#39;t be the best possible hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://pokerwants.com/strategy-tips/beginner/basic-badugi-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerwants.com/?p=122#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Er, 4 aces would be awful! You would need to discard 3 of them. Not even a good starting hand IMO. Poor article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, 4 aces would be awful! You would need to discard 3 of them. Not even a good starting hand IMO. Poor article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelsi Guidry</title>
		<link>http://pokerwants.com/strategy-tips/beginner/basic-badugi-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelsi Guidry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerwants.com/?p=122#comment-27</guid>
		<description>No. The article says &quot;if you miraculously pulled the 4 aces, you would have the best possible hand.&quot; Aces are actually played as the lowest cards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. The article says &#8220;if you miraculously pulled the 4 aces, you would have the best possible hand.&#8221; Aces are actually played as the lowest cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Smith</title>
		<link>http://pokerwants.com/strategy-tips/beginner/basic-badugi-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerwants.com/?p=122#comment-26</guid>
		<description>4 aces would be a very bad hand, wouldn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4 aces would be a very bad hand, wouldn&#39;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
